-26% $17.86$17.86
FREE delivery May 20 - 21
Ships from: textbooks_source Sold by: textbooks_source
$15.70$15.70
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Best Peddler
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The War of the Roses: 1455-1485 (Essential Histories) Paperback – April 20, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length96 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherOsprey Publishing
- Publication dateApril 20, 2003
- Dimensions6.65 x 0.5 x 9.75 inches
- ISBN-101841764914
- ISBN-13978-1841764917
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
From the Publisher
|
|
|
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Editorial Reviews
From the Publisher
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Osprey Publishing (April 20, 2003)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 96 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1841764914
- ISBN-13 : 978-1841764917
- Item Weight : 12.2 ounces
- Dimensions : 6.65 x 0.5 x 9.75 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #755,287 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #1,064 in England History
- #17,739 in Military History (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Hicks starts out by laying down the various factors that set the stage for conflict—economic distress, popular discontent, foreign wars, and one very large ego. He also discusses relevant ideologies concerning the monarchy and inheritance. He paints a sympathetic portrait of Henry VI as a man who was quite capable of ruling, but preferred to leave certain aspects of governance to others. When he did step in and make decisions, he sometimes had little or no choice. Richard of York, in contrast, is portrayed as aggressive, arrogant, and entitled.
Where the book gets really interesting is in the discussion of the three wars and the years separating them. Hicks does a superb job of relating the issues, events, and personalities that kept the conflict going for so long. He argues that the Wars of the Roses did NOT end with the victory of Henry Tudor in 1485, but extended beyond Bosworth perhaps as far as the reign of Henry VIII, when the factors that had given rise to them in the first place finally disappeared. Hicks presents his case well and I look forward to comparing his views with other historians’.
My quibbles are few and minor: Professor Hicks refers often to “bastard feudalism” without ever defining the term. His phrasing at times is confusing, for example, stating that the royal family (Lancasters) escaped capture when he means everyone but Henry VI, or writing that every king was descended from William the Conqueror and all from Henry II without making clear why he is making this distinction. He leaves unspecified some details such as how Edward IV sought to wrest his Crown from Warwick when Edward was being controlled by him, or what the precise allegations against Edward and the Wydvilles were.
But these are drops in a vast ocean of fascinating scholarship. In this book, Professor Hicks makes this tumultuous and sometimes confusing period of English history comprehensible to the amateur reader. I highly recommend this volume.
I don't fully know the conventional thinking on this war so the details on the challenge were hard to digest. I wanted to learn about the war --- and I did --- but there were narrative and organizational problems made it more difficult than it should have been.
One problem is with definitions. On p.28, where the author defines "bastard feudalism", which the author (who according to the dust jacket has written a book on this) considers a necessary condition of these wars, as a system where a lord could call all in his employ to pageantry or battle. As a lay person, this is my view of feudalism, so how "bastard feudalism" differs is not clear. Similarly, a new concept (to me), that of "entails in tail male" on p. 36, seems to be a method of oral or written testament to override inheritance by primogeniture, but this is not clear.
There are things for which better immediate connections would help. For instance, there are many mentions that the Yorkists are promoting a "reform" or "good government" agenda. Not until p. 172 is the agenda itself spelled out, and it contradicts the many pevious references to "reform agenda" (and also what seems to be part of the author's thesis), but fits the actions of the Yorkists: "However, the Yorkist programme had not proposed a reformed system of government. It entailed rather the better management of the existing system by good rather than evil counselors, in short, themselves."
Queen Margaret is mentioned several times in the first half. You learn that historians are split about her influence, but neither the debate, nor what she is doing is not defined is defined until, finally, on p. 152 comes the first evidence that she is a player, she raises an army in Scotland.
While I don't know this history well enough to critique the balance of events, Henry VI's mental illness comes and goes with no telling of what this illness was and how it vanished. This 2+ year period would seem to be a major event and a major influence in what happened next, but it is mentioned, not explained or analyzed. Similarly Richard, Duke of York who dominates the first half of the book is key to initiating this many years struggle, dies in battle and this is sum total of what is said: "Obviously the defeat at Wakefield and the deaths of both York and Salisbury were unexpected disasters for the Yorkist cause." It would seem that for a key player this would be a big event and it seems there should be something about how he was struck, his mourners/burial, his inheritance. If nothing is known, since Richard is so important to the story, the absence of information should be noted.
The plates are very good and appropriate. The publisher opted for b & w over color, making more of them possible than if color had been used.
The final chapter "The End of the Wars" and the Epilogue are very good and can be used as free standing commentary on these wars for informed readers. "The End..." talks about the significance of the wars both then and now.
Despite all the above, I got through it and learned a lot about this multi-generational war and its aftermath. It's hard to assign stars for an ambitious work like this when I don't have be background to critique its actual thesis. While there is 5 star information here, my experience of the book was 3 stars or less. I'm going to round this higher due to knowledge of the author and the work he put into the it.