Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
-36% $28.75$28.75
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Aurora-Originals
$8.55$8.55
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: FindAnyBook
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths
Purchase options and add-ons
A revisionist account of the most famous trial and execution in Western civilization―one with great resonance for American society today.
Socrates’ trial and death together form an iconic moment in Western civilization. In 399 BCE, the great philosopher stood before an Athenian jury on serious charges: impiety and “subverting the young men of the city.” The picture we have of it―created by his immediate followers, Plato and Xenophon, and perpetuated in countless works of literature and art ever since―is of a noble man putting his lips to the poisonous cup of hemlock, sentenced to death in a fit of folly by an ancient Athenian democracy already fighting for its own life. But an icon, an image, is not reality, and time has transmuted so many of the facts into historical fable.Aware of these myths, Robin Waterfield has examined the actual Greek sources and presents here a new Socrates, in which he separates the legend from the man himself. As Waterfield recounts the story, the charges of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens were already enough for a death sentence, but the prosecutors accused him of more. They asserted that Socrates was not just an atheist and the guru of a weird sect but also an elitist who surrounded himself with politically undesirable characters and had mentored those responsible for defeat in the Peloponnesian War. Their claims were not without substance, for Plato and Xenophon, among Socrates’ closest companions, had idolized him as students, while Alcibiades, the hawkish and notoriously self-serving general, had brought Athens to the brink of military disaster. In fact, as Waterfield perceptively shows through an engrossing historical narrative, there was a great deal of truth, from an Athenian perspective, in these charges.
The trial was, in part, a response to troubled times―Athens was reeling from a catastrophic war and undergoing turbulent social changes―and Socrates’ companions were unfortunately direct representatives of these troubles. Their words and actions, judiciously sifted and placed in proper context, not only serve to portray Socrates as a flesh-and-blood historical figure but also provide a good lens through which to explore both the trial and the general history of the period.
Ultimately, the study of these events and principal figures allows us to finally strip away the veneer that has for so long denied us glimpses of the real Socrates. Why Socrates Died is an illuminating, authoritative account of not only one of the defining periods of Western civilization but also of one of its most defining figures. 4 pages of illustrations
- ISBN-100393065278
- ISBN-13978-0393065275
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateJune 8, 2009
- LanguageEnglish
- Dimensions6.5 x 1.1 x 9.5 inches
- Print length284 pages
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
From Booklist
Review
― Bryce Christensen, Booklist
"From the author of Xenophon's Retreat comes this fascinating study of the history behind the case against Socrates. A useful glossary, bibliography, and extensive notes complete this fine work. A real page-turner."
― Ann Oughton, Historical Novels Review
"A thorough and fascinating account of the democratic process of lawmaking and justice in Athens....[a] learned book in clear, concise prose."
― Stewart Desmond, Library Journal
"Starred Review. Of the many introductory studies on the Athenian judicial system, the trial of Socrates, the conflict between Athens and Sparta and the reasons that democracy gave way to oligarchy in Athens, this is among the clearest, most well-organized and most concise."
― Publishers Weekly
From the Back Cover
In the spring of 399 BCE, Socrates stood trial in his native Athens. The court was packed, and after being found guilty by his peers, Socrates died by drinking a cup of the poison hemlock. But, Robin Waterfield asks in this provocative reinterpretation of one of the most famous court cases in world history, is this the whole story? Examining not only the actual records but placing Socrates in the historical context of an Athenian society in a state of moral decline, Waterfield provides a gripping portrait of our most enduring philosopher.
Praise for Robin Waterfield’s Xenophon’s Retreat:
“An excellent book. Robin Waterfield writes very well, in a style that is accessible and sophisticated.”―Barry Strauss, Cornell University, author of The Trojan War
“A timeless story as well as a vivid tale of its times.”―BBC History magazine
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company (June 8, 2009)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 284 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393065278
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393065275
- Item Weight : 1.04 pounds
- Dimensions : 6.5 x 1.1 x 9.5 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,932,372 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #2,066 in Ancient Greek History (Books)
- #2,909 in Ancient Greek & Roman Philosophy
- #80,627 in Unknown
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Robin Anthony Herschel Waterfield (born 1952) is a British classical scholar, translator, editor, and writer of children's fiction. Waterfield was born in 1952, and studied Classics at Manchester University, where he achieved a first class degree in 1974. He went on to research ancient Greek philosophy at King's College, Cambridge until 1978, after which he became a lecturer at Newcastle University and then St Andrews University. He later became a copy-editor and later a commissioning editor for Penguin Books. He is now a self-employed writer, living in southern Greece, where he has Greek citizenship.
Bio from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
"Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myths" is a superb book that investigates every aspect of Socrates' trial. Robin Waterfield was extensive in his research, clear in his prose, and convincing in his arguments. His style and tone are both appropriate; I didn't even find a single typographical error in the entire work! Waterfield's scholarship and sophistication pervades this literary work and anyone who reads it will likely feel the same. If you are an admirer of Socrates, Ancient Greece, or its culture and history--or if you're simply interested in the aforementioned--I highly recommend this book.
Oh and if you idolize Socrates like I did and still somewhat do, be prepared to have your perspective challenged. He disillusioned me from my somewhat idealized perception of Socrates, whom I viewed as my idol. Needless to say, this book is powerful enough to stimulate a die-hard Socratic like me into re-examining the life of one of the greatest philosophers to have ever lived.
Lastly, my only complaint is that the references are collected in the back and simply refer to certain lines in the book. I would have much rather preferred for the references to have been in endnote format and the numbers electronically linked for easy navigation. A small quote snippet given with the assumption that the reader will remember that specific passage--despite how the passage was not noted whatsoever--is disappointing. This alone almost got me to rate this only four stars. That excluded, this is an excellent read and I recommend it to anyone willing to give it a go.
Waterfield elucidates the case against Socrates over many pages. He sums it up on page 191, quoting from the book: "He was a clever arguer and taught young men to be clever arguers; he usurped their fathers' roles in education and in general was perceived to be subversive of inherited values..." In a time of unrest, of conflict between democracy and oligarchy, and the war with Sparta, Athenians were fed up with Socrates's undermining of the traditional faith and conventions. That was enough in the Athenian democratic system, to be a crime.
There was more, of course. He was young Alcibiades's teacher, the most prominent young Athenian if his time. Alcibiades was brilliant and handsome, an oligarch, and went on to play a traitorous role in the war with Sparta. Socrates also seemed allied with Critias, a member the The Thirty tyrants, who briefly took power in Athens in a coup that led to civil war, although Socrates himself played no role in the tyranny. Socrates was not a friend of Athenian democracy, as it was structured.
It reads to me as if there are parallels in the struggle between democrats and oligarchs and today's progressive liberals and small-government conservatives. The democrats constantly worked to hedge and contain the power of the few wealthy oligarchs, and believed in collective decision-making and the betterment of "the many" at the expense of the oligarchs. The oligarchs believed in reducing the role of democracy and its conventions and bureaucracy, of promoting the progress of the state by promoting the progress of "the best", of the brightest and most capable men (who were of course oligarchs).
Hemlock could not have been an easy way to die. You didn't simply go to sleep painlessly. You apparently are asphyxiated as your diaphragm stops working. Socrates is said to have willingly taken hemlock rather than escape at the urging of his friends. As Waterfield presents him, he is filled with what we would regard as faults, but not what we could call crimes. And certainly not faults worthy of execution.
Top reviews from other countries
As often from Robin Waterfield, this book wears its considerable research lightly, and remains very readable and enjoyable. A great deal of information on the turbulent political and legal environment leading up to the execution of Socrates is presented – yet conveniently organised into short sections of just a few pages which are clearly sub titled for people to seek out particular areas of interest and curiosity.
Other questions, like why Plato was so reluctant to get involved formally with politics, are also answered indirectly within this book’s pages. When one understands the harshness of the political environment of the time one can understand Plato’s stance much better.
This book also raised some new questions for me – such as how poor was Socrates really? We should not be fooled by his walking around without shoes; since apparently this was much the custom in Sparta at the time, whose political organisation was of considerable appeal to Socrates. Indeed, two of his former young associates, Alcibiades and Critias, were also pro the Spartan constitution – and hence cast dark shadows on Socrates and whether the city of Athens would simply be better off with him or without him, as the court case tended to focus on. The fragile recently re-established Athenian democracy of the time (following the long war with Sparta and then the cruel period of the 30 tyrants) was very wary of ‘young’ aristocrats with their undemocratic and pro Spartan stance. Of great concern also were older thinkers like Socrates who encouraged them to question the ‘staus quo’ of their ancestors who had traditionally ruled Athens.
In conclusion, the book clearly and succinctly describes the world Socrates inhabited, and the reasons why he ‘really’ was put to death. The reasons are rather more complex than the unfair and harsh execution many of us have traditionally had in our minds. ‘HIGHLY RECOMMENED’.
This book is very insightful and interesting; well-written and very thorough. I recommend it highly. The author's book on Xenophon is also very good, and I would recommend that too.
Both these books offer very good background and interesting historical analysis of Athens during its imperial phase and its struggles with Sparta and Persia.
Socrates had a turbulent relationship with Alcibiades as his teacher and possibly lover, and many of Socrates's student followers were rich and opponents of the Athenian democracy, including Critias, violently anti-democratic and one of the main leaders of the oligarchic coups. Waterfield argues in a final section that, although by 399BC, Critias and Alcibiades were both dead, Socrates was tarnished by his association with them. The charges he faced, impiety, worshipping new gods and corrupting the young were motivated by political revenge rather than moral or religious concerns.
However, Waterfield argues that Socrates' death was caused by his own suicidal behaviour. The jury convicted him by only a narrow majority, after which, the prosecutor and Socrates each proposed a penalty. By not proposing a fine or exile instead of death, but dinners at public expense, he created outrage which ensured a big majority for the death penalty. This is an intriguing argument, but an alternative to Waterfield's view is that Socrates was so out of touch he really believed that his actions were more worthy of praise than condemnation.
Overall an interesting book, but only one of many theories about Socrates's trial and death. He idea that Socrates deliberately sought death is not really proved.
The book lacks Socrates. There may be evidential reasons why the book suggested by the title cannot be written, but I feel I have just read a tepid version of Thucydides, and would not encourage anyone to read the book, unless they want to know a lot of detail about what happened BEFORE Socrates trial and death