Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.
$14.75$14.75
Ships from: Amazon.com Sold by: Amazon.com
$8.33$8.33
Ships from: Amazon Sold by: Qtkdesigns
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Early Greek Science: Thales to Aristotle (Ancient Culture and Society) Paperback – February 17, 1974
Purchase options and add-ons
Although there is no exact equivalent to our term science in Greek, Western science may still be said to have originated with the Greeks, for they were the first to attempt to explain natural phenomena consistently in naturalistic terms, and they initiated the practices of rational criticism of scientific theories.
This study traces Greek science through the work of the Pythagoreans, the Presocratic natural philosophers, the Hippocratic writers, Plato, the fourth-century B.C. astronomers, and Aristotle. G. E. R. Lloyd also investigates the relationships between science and philosophy and science and medicine; he discusses the social and economic setting of early Greek science; and he analyzes the motives and incentives of the different groups of writers.- Print length176 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherW. W. Norton & Company
- Publication dateFebruary 17, 1974
- Dimensions5.1 x 0.5 x 7.8 inches
- ISBN-100393005836
- ISBN-13978-0393005837
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product details
- Publisher : W. W. Norton & Company; New edition (February 17, 1974)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 176 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0393005836
- ISBN-13 : 978-0393005837
- Item Weight : 4.4 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.1 x 0.5 x 7.8 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #981,089 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,327 in History & Philosophy of Science (Books)
- #5,366 in Ancient Civilizations
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Many readers have voiced that they did not "get" this book, nor its importance. That is likely because the Ancient Greeks were largely concerned with knowledge of all things and how they interrelated. We are very compartmentalized in our current educational system. Science is science, philosophy is philosophy and they don't need to mix (or so some moderns will say). For the Greeks, they were inseparable because they aimed at one and the same thing, the truth. It's odd to think that one can mix geometry and religion, but there it is in the Pythagoreans.
There are many modern "science" books that claim theological and philosophical positions. One only need to look around for half a second to find books on godless science, creationism, universe from nothing and the like. Such questions were also asked by the presocratics. Parmenides realized that something could not come from nothing, thus implying a permanence to the universe (and likely an eternal universe as Aristotle would (comment on). These are still themes in modern science. Is the universe infinite? Is it composed of many things? What is it composed of?
The beauty of this book is that Lloyd does all this in a very short amount of space. He is lucid and to the point. There is hardly a moment of fluff in his writings, thus making it a good read. That doesn't mean you will finish it as quickly as a novel. It is filled with information that likely will require time to digest. Having been introduced to the presocratics multiple times before, I would like to think it took me less time to digest than others. I can also imagine some people who couldn't digest it at all, being unable to compare and contrast to other elements of philosophy.
The two big achievements of early Greek science were giving natural (as opposed to supernatural) explanations for how the world works, and having rational debate about the natural world. Even though early Greek explanations for natural phenomena like earthquakes are speculative, they are an advance over previous explanations because they are entirely naturalistic, for example explaining earthquakes as a result of waves in water on which the earth floats instead of being due to the anger of Posiedon. Also, rather than dealing with any particular earthquake, early Greek scientists were interested in earthquakes in general. On the other hand, a tradition of intellectual criticism forced thinkers to justify their theories, rather than just to assert them. Their theories were in competition and these thinkers were not telling stories that could be inconsistent with other stories. Therefore Greek thinkers would develop solid ideas that could be defended with evidence lest their opponents find weaknesses in their arguments. This habit of rational debate was due to citizens having to make convincing arguments when participating in the government of their cities. (There is indeed tension between winning arguments and determining the truth, and Lloyd discusses this.)
Greek scientists had to decide what convincing evidence was. Heraclitus and Parmenides raised the question of how much we should trust the evidence of the senses; Heraclitus said that evidence of the senses should be used cautiously, while Parmenides said that reason alone should be trusted. Empedocles made what I consider a very important point: "[the senses] are feeble instruments, but so too is the mind" (p. 39). Of course we can come to wrong conclusions by observation, but we also make mistakes in reasoning.
Naturalistic explanations were a huge advance, but having precise, mathematical, explanations is a further advance. Empedocles had a theory that everything is made from the irreducible roots earth, water, air and fire in precise proportions. But the surviving fragments of his writings only have two instances where he assigns precise proportions: bone is composed of fire, water and earth in the ratio 4:2:2, and blood is made of the four roots in equal ratios. It's not at all clear how one would figure out the proportions of the roots in a given substance and how one could be sure they were right. Similarly, Leucippus came up with an atomic theory of matter but didn't apply the theory to explain anything in particular. But their goals were different than our goals: "Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Leucippus and Democritus were chiefly engaged not in programmes of research, but in discussions of a highly abstract nature in which what counted was not the empirical data that could be adduced in support of a theory, so much as the economy and consistency of the arguments on which it was based." (p. 49) Another example of the shift to a precise theory is Eudoxus of Cnidus's mathematical model of the movements of the heavenly bodies, which Lloyd discusses in Chapter 7. Earlier systems didn't give precise accounts of these movements, and it is giving a precise account "that distinguishes the later fourth-century theories and marks an epoch in the development of astronomy. (p. 82)