$49.95$49.95
$3.97 delivery May 21 - 22
Ships from: Poverty Hill Books Sold by: Poverty Hill Books
$13.33$13.33
$3.99 delivery May 15 - 20
Ships from: Books and Medias Sold by: Books and Medias
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Empires of the Plain : Henry Rawlinson and the Lost Languages of Babylon Hardcover – January 1, 2003
Purchase options and add-ons
- Reading age1 year and up
- Print length1000 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherHarperCollins
- Publication dateJanuary 1, 2003
- ISBN-100007128991
- ISBN-13978-0007128990
The Amazon Book Review
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Customers who bought this item also bought
Product details
- Publisher : HarperCollins; First Edition (January 1, 2003)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 1000 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0007128991
- ISBN-13 : 978-0007128990
- Reading age : 1 year and up
- Item Weight : 1.64 pounds
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Visit www.adkinshistory.com for further details, newsletter and events.
Lesley Adkins is a historian and archaeologist, author of numerous critically acclaimed non-fiction books on social and naval history, and also on archaeology and the ancient world. Her books are mostly written with her husband Roy Adkins, and their latest one is WHEN THERE WERE BIRDS: THE FORGOTTEN HISTORY OF OUR CONNECTIONS. Other books include GIBRALTAR: THE GREATEST SIEGE IN BRITISH HISTORY; JANE AUSTEN'S ENGLAND (called 'Eavesdropping on Jane Austen's England' in the UK); JACK TAR: LIFE IN NELSON'S NAVY; THE WAR FOR ALL THE OCEANS; EMPIRES OF THE PLAIN; and THE KEYS OF EGYPT. They have been translated into several languages worldwide. She lives in England, near Exeter in Devon.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The writer is remiss in excluding archaeologist Seton Lloyd's excellent book "Foundations in the Dust" from the list of recommended readings.
It is to be regretted that the author seems to to lend credence to one of the most ridiculous myths of all time, in discussing at length what she thinks may have happened to Noah's Ark amid the glaciers high atop Mt. Ararat. Unfortunate, too, that the author and the publisher's editor could not manage between them to spell Maharashtra correctly.
Henry is first and foremost a military officer working for the East India Company at a time when Asians are referred to as Orientals whether they are Indian, Afghani or Iranian so some of the titles of various professors or scientists will seem odd. Henry has surprizingly little to do most of the time so he spends his time ruining horses in racing contests and shooting anything that moves for the pure pleasure of killing. He can't really bond with anybody because of the class war and because he didn't enlist in the regular army or go to college so he spends his time drinking and chasing women (the author alludes to this only briefly but considering the sources used...) and ocassionally looking at ancient ruins. And there's the rub. He wants credit for discoveries so he pulls aristocratic strings that force dramatic delays in progress with regard to either finding artifacts or translating them. A better man would have chosen at most a few areas to study or having rediscovered an ancient site, urged another less busy person to come hither and investigate but not Henry. His military career puts him in India, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq and possibly Turkmenistan or Azerbaijan. When time is available and it often is not, he takes a chance to explore ruins and speculate about his findings. He didn't go to college so he is in over his head. He does copy a few writings here and there but then he hints to the Royal Society of London that he has found major breakthroughs and of course refuses to cough up more than bits and pieces. Some British and French scientists are keen to use the Christian Bible and ancient Greek stories to uncover lost civilizations. Surprizingly, nobody seems keen to use the Koran or ancient Roman stories. Surprizingly, some Christian leaders are against excavations on the grounds that they might uncover disturbing scientific facts that discredit the Christian Bible. Henry is continually asked to share his discoveries so that more talented experts can assist with the digging and the translation but he refuses out of selfishness and offers the most pathetic excuses. Because he is a military officer, he rarely gets a chance to return to these sites to do serious assessments yet still demands full credit for discovery and his interpretion of ancient events based on his limited knowledge. Several years later when he can finally take a leave of absence without damaging his military career, he returns to Britain and provides findings that are helpful but still extremely limited in scope. Thus the selling point to the British public is that this brave young man climbed a dangerous cliffside to view some ancient carvings written in 3 languages. He's a hero because one French archaelogist attempted the same thing and gave up. Apparently there wasn't much competition in those days nor was anybody interested in doing it right by bringing better telescopes, ropes, ladders or perhaps an engineer that can build such things? He's also a hero because he translated a few stones. Hard work by another member of what is now the UK is ignored because of his racial background (One really must admire those British and their fair play). Hard work by French and German researchers are deliberately delayed, downplayed and eventually discredited so that Britain can have a hero. Well done! The behavior of the Royal Society of London borders on inexcusable! The French discovered an ancient ruin and dug several items out of it, moved them to the river and sent them downstream to boat waiting to bring them back to France for research and display, but the British force the boat to wait MONTHS before leaving for no other reason than that the British want to poke around in the same ruins, find more stuff and claim first credit. One sees the dark side of archaeology in all its glory.
At this point, you might be wondering about cuneiforms. I know I was. The author weaves an interesting story but is rather weak on the linguistics. Cuneiforms are not discussed except to suggest that multiple ancient civilizations seemed to like the concept of writing things down and apparently tweaked cuneiform to tolerate their languages (similar to the way many European languages use the Roman alphabet) rather than simply inventing their own written language. This sounds intriguing but we are left without any details. Similarly, we learn that two writing methods are used: written and cursive and two methods are used: clay tablets to keep around the city and stone carvings in mountainsides to last an eternity. All this is very interesting but clearly I need to read a different book.
Top reviews from other countries
I purchased mored more copies to give away to friends.